Wildland Firefighting Practice Exam

What is a major disadvantage of the direct attack method in wildland firefighting?

1. Might not be effective against a slowly spreading fire

2. Exposes firefighters to direct flame and smoke

3. Doesn't utilize natural barriers

4. Reduces the need for mop up

The correct answer is: Exposes firefighters to direct flame and smoke

The major disadvantage of the direct attack method in wildland firefighting is that it exposes firefighters to direct flame and smoke. This method involves applying water or fire retardants directly onto the fire's edge or the flames themselves, which can put firefighters in close proximity to hazardous conditions such as intense heat, flame fronts, and smoke inhalation. Direct exposure increases the risk of burns, respiratory issues, and other injuries for the crew involved. This is particularly concerning in situations where the fire behavior is unpredictable or aggressive, potentially leading to dangerous circumstances for those engaged in the attack. Although other methods, such as the indirect attack, might provide a safer distance from the fire by utilizing natural barriers or creating control lines, the direct attack’s approach emphasizes immediate suppression at the fire’s edge, thereby increasing safety risks for the personnel involved.